A Closer Look at Maintenance Court Procedures in South Africa

16 April 2025 ,  Tinus Botes 203

Divorce and maintenance claims are often emotionally charged and legally complex processes. In South Africa, the maintenance court, established under the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998, plays an important role in ensuring that dependents, particularly children, are financially supported after a divorce or separation.

The maintenance court is a specialised court established under Section 3 of the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998. Every magistrate’s court in South Africa is designated as a maintenance court within its area of jurisdiction. The Act emphasises that every person has a legal duty to maintain their dependents, and the court provides a mechanism to enforce this duty when necessary. Failure to meet this duty can result in serious consequences, including fines or imprisonment under Section 31 of the Act.

The maintenance court aims to protect the rights of dependents, ensuring that children and other dependents are not left without financial support after a divorce or separation. This is in line with Section 15 of the Maintenance Act, which outlines the duty of parents to support their children, including providing for their living, upbringing, education, and medical care. 

The maintenance court process begins with an application for maintenance. The maintenance officer is required, under Section 7 of the Act, to investigate the complaint and may summon both parties to a hearing. During the enquiry, the magistrate will consider factors such as the financial needs of the dependent, the respondent’s income, and any other relevant circumstances. The court may also subpoena witnesses or request financial documents to assist in determining the appropriate maintenance amount under Section 9.

If the court finds that the respondent has a legal duty to support the claimant, it will issue a maintenance order under Section 16. This order specifies the amount and frequency of payments and is legally binding. Failure to comply with the order can result in penalties, including imprisonment under Section 31. If the respondent fails to pay, the claimant can return to court to enforce the order. Section 26 provides for enforcement through garnishee orders (deducting maintenance directly from the respondent’s salary), attachment of debts, or execution against property. The court may also impose penalties for non-compliance, including fines or imprisonment.

An important case is Bannatyne v Bannatyne 2003 (2) SA 363 (CC), where the Constitutional Court ruled that maintenance orders must be enforced strictly. The court held that failure to pay maintenance undermines the dignity and rights of dependents, and courts have a duty to ensure compliance. The court in Bannatyne emphasised not only the role of the maintenance courts but also the importance of protecting the children of South Africa by stating in paragraph 28: 

“It is a function of the state not only to provide a good legal framework, but to put in place systems that will enable these frameworks to operate effectively. Our maintenance courts and the laws that they implement are important mechanisms to give effect to the rights of children protected by section 28 of the Constitution. Failure to ensure their effective operation amounts to a failure to protect children against those who take advantage of the weaknesses of the system.”

For someone facing a maintenance issue, understanding these processes and legal principles is crucial. The maintenance court provides a vital service, but navigating the system can be daunting. Seeking legal advice can also be invaluable, as a lawyer can help you navigate the system more effectively and ensure that your rights are protected. 

If you are facing a maintenance dispute, it is important to approach the process with a clear understanding of your rights and the legal procedures involved to achieve the best possible outcome. 

Reference List:
1. Maintenance Act 99 of 1998
2. Bannatyne v Bannatyne 2003 (2) SA 363 (CC)

WRITTEN BY TINUS BOTES
Tinus Botes is a Candidate Attorney at Miller Bosman Le Roux Attorneys.

While every reasonable effort is taken to ensure the accuracy and soundness of the contents of this publication, neither the writers of articles nor the publisher will bear any responsibility for the consequences of any actions based on information or recommendations contained herein. Our material is for informational purposes.

Related Expertise: Divorce and Maintenance
Share: