Home
/
Our Insights
/
Article Detail
/
Home
/
Home
|
Login
Our Team
Our Expertise
Our Insights
BOND CALCULATOR
SUBSCRIBE
Our Team
Our Expertise
Our Insights
You can share this article in the following networks2:
How far is a bank liable if you lose your credit card and pin?
10 July 2020
248
“I lost my wallet with my credit card in it and a piece of paper on which I wrote down my new card pin number. Because I was hoping I may still find my wallet, I didn’t immediately stop my bank card. A few hours later somebody used my card to pay for food on the other side of town. I then immediately phoned the bank to stop the card and informed the bank that somebody else had my card and pin. The bank told me in that case the bank would not be liable for my losses. Is this true?”
Generally, when unauthorised transactions have taken place on a bank card, the bank will investigate to ascertain how the transaction had occurred and who was liable for losses incurred. In general most card agreements entered into between a bank and cardholder includes provisions that the cardholder has a contractual obligation to keep the card safe and not disclose the card pin to anyone. The bank also has a contractual obligation to mitigate losses in a case where the cardholder informs them of a fraudulent transaction.
Our courts have found that a cardholder can be liable for losses if the cardholder acts negligently by for example, disclosing the pin. This was determined after taking into account the provisions of the Code of Banking Practice in South Africa read together with the contract concluded between the bank and the cardholder. Exceptions may be where card thieves have obtained the pin by recording the cardholder when using the pin etc. and the Ombudsman for Banking Services indicated in a Card Cloning Bulletin that it cannot reasonably be expected that a cardholder must search for things like hidden cameras.
Where a card pin was obtained for example by the cardholder storing the pin in a wallet with his card and the card and pin were used to conclude transactions, it will probably stand to good reason that the cardholder was negligent in this respect and the bank would not be liable for the unauthorised transactions, taking into account the contractual terms between the bank and the cardholder.
Banks do however generally have an obligation to mitigate losses, subject to the circumstances of each case, and if a cardholder for instance informed the bank that the card and pin has been compromised or stolen and the bank fails to stop the card, then the bank could be held liable for losses ensuing.
Each case will however have to be assessed on its merits and the refusal of a bank to accept liability for losses can be challenged by a court or possibly the Ombudsman for Banking Services. In your case the circumstances appear to point towards negligence on your side which will preclude the bank from being liable for the unauthorised transaction on your card.
Previous
Smart contracts: where do they fit into the legal framework?
Next
How valid is a marriage contract if not confirmed by court?
Related Expertise:
Banking and Finance
,
Dispute Resolution
Tags:
Bank
,
Cardholder
,
Fraud
,
Liability
,
Negligence
,
Pin number
Share:
Talk to us
Get in touch with us to discuss how we can help you with your Banking and Finance challenges
Get in touch
Popular Insights
Understanding Your Rights: Breach and Penalty Clauses in Property Agreements
The NHI Bill: What to Know
When Can My Employer Convert My Paid Suspension to Unpaid?
Wrongfully Arrested by the Police: How Much Money Can You Claim?
Related Insights
Don’t lose your title deed!
When should you register your B-BBEE transaction with the B-BBEE Commission?
Health and safety and the employer
Recent Insights
Don’t lose your title deed!
When should you register your B-BBEE transaction with the B-BBEE Commission?
Health and safety and the employer
You can share this article in the following networks:
Offices
+27 21 840 8000
law@mblh.co.za
Facebook
Back to top